{"id":554,"date":"2011-08-16T10:12:50","date_gmt":"2011-08-16T09:12:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/weblog.ginekezikken.nl\/?p=554"},"modified":"2011-11-02T08:59:23","modified_gmt":"2011-11-02T07:59:23","slug":"katwijk-in-de-schilderkunst","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/weblog.ginekezikken.nl\/index.php\/2011\/08\/16\/katwijk-in-de-schilderkunst\/","title":{"rendered":"Katwijk in de schilderkunst"},"content":{"rendered":"

 <\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Bij de expositie die nu in het Katwijks museum te zien is, is de herziene en uitgebreide versie van het prachtige boek “Katwijk in de schilderkunst” uitgegeven met daarin een grote foto van mijn schilderij van de boulevard van Katwijk, dat door het museum is gekocht. Maar zowel in het boek als op de expositie staat vermeld dat ik het werk in 1996 heb gemaakt. Het was 10 jaar later. In 1996 had ik de academie nog niet afgerond.<\/p>\n

Coming with the exhibition now to be seen in the museum of Katwijk, the revised and expanded version of the wonderful book “Katwijk in de schilderkunst” is published containing a large photo of my painting of the boulevard of Katwijk, which was purchased by the museum. But both the book and the exhibition stated that I’ve made\u00a0<\/em>the work\u00a0<\/em>i<\/em>n 1996. Actually it was 10 years later. In 1996 I had not yet completed the academy.<\/em><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n\"Share\"<\/a>\n